carbon neutral power is simple

Nature does carbon 0 power

Nuclear power is not carbon zero!  He constructs its plants using loads of concrete, produced using a fossil fuel burn.  Making an active nuclear power plant building programme.  Mankind's fourth biggest source of carbon emissions!

It uses a a fossil fuel burn on limestone to make concrete.  Employing uranium nuclear fission choose is a source of heat, would make radioactive concrete.  Which nuclear power does not want!  He proposed to use an oil burn on limestone.

Then after 25 years a nuclear plant is demolished - engineers have designed the plant to all break after 25 years.  Conventional power plants just carry on!  In nuclear power plant makes as much carbon dioxide as a conventional plant in 25 years.  All concentrated in the two years a nuclear power plant construction.

By every 3 minutes around the world there is a lightening strike.  That turns regular water into helium and oxygen gases, with massive heat: it does molecular nuclear fusion.

And has done for 3.8 billion years!

1 H₂O+P+TU→He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+E²

So nature around the world is using the turbulence within snow or rain storms, to continuously do molecular nuclear fusion: the free carbon zero Energy System.  Continuously around the world - as you're reading this document.

The policy charge collects with the positive ions above the clouds layer.  The negative charge falls of electrons to the ground.

At 5000 volts, a partial steam plasma links up the cloud tops with the ground.  Discharging in three sections all that electrical potential.  But once set up, the steam plasma again does molecular nuclear fusion.

2 H₂O+P+PL→2(E²+L...Xray) a lightening strike!  That releases 2.4 MW/m of heat.  5 tonnes of He gas - 2.5x10³⁰W of energy in 3 seconds, from 1.5km x 2cm steam plasma.

This is very much not rocket science!  Nature has been doing it spontaneously since there were or liquid lakes of water around the early earth.

This process goes on around Venus, on the turbulent flow of steam clouds in the atmosphere.  They've rating just so much heat!

If we fire up a 50x1cm steam plasma are four atmospheres in a glass centre, we get a constant 2.4 MW of carbon neutral heat.  The glass tube will shine hot for ever!  Utilising just 10⁻ⁱ⁵cc of regular water.  We are doing a plasma burn!  Which is twice the dynamism of molecular nuclear fusion.

We use the steam plasma to heat water in a boiler room.  And drive a commercially sourced steam turbine.  Which would generate 1.2 MW of mains electricity.

We synchronise the AC with the national frequency and voltage, and sell our excess current.  And the national grid will send us a check annually for six million UK pounds.

And we utilising two tiny a volume of water ever to measure in 1000 lifetimes!  Using a Energy System that nature has employed around the earth for 3.8 billion years.

We have enclosed the steam turbine in a glass cylinder, to give us a controlled lightening strike in a glass cylinder.  That it has twice the dynamism of Fre a steam plasma - a natural lightening strike.

Non of this year's rocket science!  It is first year at high school physics.  An burn or all my papers have been red and scrutinised by nuclear power.  Who still wittering on about carbon dioxide!

Ignoring the fact that they are mankind's fourth largest source of carbon emissions.  A steam plasma utilises no fossil fuel aller the radioactive materials.  It produces no radioactive waste.

Just heat light and X rays.  And lower power X rays so that - like you get from a boiling kettle of water.  As it does molecular nuclear fusion!

So carbon neutral heat and electricity is that trivial to produce.  All the physicists waiting on about manmade global warming and climate change, acting in total ignorance of the carbon cycle.

Ignoring their own enormous carbon emissions.  Never give him a the fact that the plutonium they produce, is a most toxic substance known to man.

And somewhere around the world a nuclear plant will experience a triple core meltdown at least every 25 years.  Remember Chernobyl!  Then 2010 we had Fukushima her.  Which plant will explode next?

So in summary nuclear power is very much not carbon zero!  An active nuclear power plant building programme is 1/4 largest manmade source of carbon dioxide.

A garage santis can easily build a plasma power plant.  Producing the carbon neutral heat and electricity for 150 houses.  Annual check from the national grid for the electricity alone, for six million UK pounds.

And there is no storage capabilities for radioactive waste.  They are utilising the short term storage around at have used nuclear plants: which contravenes the former nuclear plants planning consent.  As illegal as it gets!

Since the closure of windscale, there is by no global capability for nuclear waste reprocessing.  Every nuclear power plant knees annual insurance cover of 100 billion.  They carry a criminally insufficient 50 million.

Every nuclear power plant in the world running illegally!