Life is carbon zero

Life on Earth is mostly carbon based

Photosynthesis evolved in the cretaceous.  When there was 10 parts per million carbon dioxide in the air, so there was obviously some predecessor to photosynthesis.  The early earth had so now a common position to Mars - which is 98% carbon dioxide.

In the Jurassic photosynthesis was less evolved.  And left four parts per million carbon dioxide in the temperate air.  Sea levels were 60 metres lower, there was 85% more life on earth.

A generally warm period of prehistory, with three natural ice ages.  One lasting a record breaking 1000 years.  The longest ice age on mineral record.

The Jurassic was brought to an end, by a meteor striking near Mexico.  They actually be on to figure out the exact location!

There was basically a nuclear winter event.  And all the green plants' had died out!  And photosynthesis and stopped.  As the annals died.  Lack of food and association.  Just a little life so wide around the equator.

Modern photosynthesis day they use two parts per million carbon dioxide in the air.  Your tour this on a biology degree at university.  In high school biology your taught the fans taking carbon dioxide, build plant biomass and excrete oxygen.

Animals breathe in the oxygen and combine with eton plant biomass, to get at the energy.  So plant's metabolise carbon dioxide around the temperate earth down to two PPM.

1 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+L→(Cₙ(H₂O)ₙ+O₂-E)+r(He+O+Lb+E²+X-ray) O₂+O→O₃

So plants do what the late poet as Professor Bernard Argent named molecular nuclear fusion.  As he thought my title of nuclear fusion was imprecise.  Though that was my PH D study area.

So today in the light plans converts infrared light into carbohydrates, or doing molecular nuclear fusion.  The wrote in favour light and even X rays!  There being no chemical source of visible light or X rays.

A high school students are taught in a biology classes, plant's eat carbon dioxide to build plant biomass.  At university we learn down to the present limit of two PPM.

And there is still in years talking about carbon emissions affecting the climate.  These individuals are serious biological idiot.  Plans converts extra carbon dioxide and for biomass within 5 minutes.

The there are static two PPM carbon dioxide in the temperate air.  And any rational scientist will agree that a static trace gas affects nothing.  'climate change' was only nuclear cover as the global weather static cooling from 1995.  Making global warming life of the wrong.

But nuclear power continued apace scientists to talk or the new science fiction of manmade climate change.  Totally failing to engage with biology and the carbon cycle.

Plant's eat carbon dioxide down to the present limit of two PPM.  Bowling plant biomass and excreting oxygen.  Foced eat the biomass and breathe in the oxygen, and breathe out the carbon dioxide - which is plant food.

And during the daylight hours plant's eat carbon dioxide, leaving just a static two PPM carbon dioxide in the temperate air.

Above the polar ice In winter there is no photosynthesis on land or in the seas.  The snow covering the land, the CIA's blocking off the CRT from the atmospheric carbon dioxide.

So we have four PPM carbon dioxide - the Jurassic global without the dance halls.  A temperature of -80° C above the Antarctic ice mass.  By 16° C above the north pole, as the 

deep sea currents transfer heat from the equator towards the poles naturally.

So man kind has no control over biology is carbon cycle.  That went on before man had or Eva he evolved.  All carry on, so man kind has left for a better home.

A static two PPM carbon dioxide.  Carbon emissions are converted five plant's into additional plant biomass within 5 minutes during the daylight hours.  At night plants take some the oxygen gas excreted during the day, backing into oxidise fats.

And get at the residual nuclear fusion energy.  So a plasma at night to the animal half of the carbon cycle.  That during the day there is carbon dioxide to just two parts per million.

Carbon emissions increased plant life on earth.  Which will lead to a increase in all life - as plants and animals are in a dynamic balancimg act.  We are static two PPM carbon dioxide in the afternoon air.

Any santis unaware of basic high school biology so shut the hell up about the climate.  Nature fixes carbon dioxide at a static preindustrial two parts per million.  All that doubles in the arctic winters.

Well experienced the lowest natural temperatures on earth!  So twice the carbon dioxide, was 80° C.  Which is why my PH D supervisor from Sheffield University, professor Z at first 13 ever publish any work on carbon dioxide and the climate.

Though my abortive PH D umder him 2000, a window of cancer in 5000 UK pounds.  The first of Maria from Sheffield to salford quays.  The professor, no considering the climate change and global warming would nuclear science fiction.

So the global afternoon air around the temperate earth has the Prix industrial two parts per million carbon dioxide in.  The climate controlled exclusively by a predictable solar emission cycles.

So cooling from 1995 until 2023.  Even the Martian climate!  With 98% carbon dioxide in.  Ironically the science fiction of rubbish coal, cured by the paid stooges to nuclear power, and totally failed to engage with biology is carbon cycle.

A static two PPM in the afternoon terrestrial air.  Me what nuclear power bills its uranium nuclear power plants using a fossil fuel burn on limestone, to make all the cement required for their reinforced concrete.

So a building a nuclear power plant is mankind's fourth largest source of carbon emissions.  Very much not carbon zero.  There again plans take Ian the carbon dioxide within 5 minutes.

So the air travel today use in a fossil fuel burn to produce heat.  He the only in my its power, so far is as hot air producing the earth for last.  Firstly air over a steam plasma cylinder, was never grid so carbon zero heating effect.  A one metrex1.5 CM steam plasma release a constant 1 MW of heat.

Converts to a fossil fuel burn and there are just 45 kW/m of fossil fuel burn.  So we drive an air crash at hypersonic speeds, totally carbon neutral!  Then he the regular water into heat light and lower power X rays.

So spitting out the pressurised air as high a temperature.  So driving the aircraft at hypersonic speed, totally carbon zero.  With no or every Asian fuel burn.  The steam plasma concerning regular juice Stillwater, to produce a massive carbon zero heat.

So we make a carbon zero aircreft though cancer was no fossil fuels.  And Bahrain has the X and engineers, who should validate that a 30x1.  Steam plasma at one atmosphere, releases a constant 1 MW our carbon zero heat.

Producing a hypersonic aircraft and firm is no fossil fuels.  Professor Z at Sheffield University was distraught, as I wrote my first paper on carbon zero heat production 2001.

He should not have worried, as 2024 biological idiots are still talking about carbon emissions affecting the weather.  Green plants on steam and have other ideas.  Sucking Ian the carbon dioxide, to freeze a oxygen and carbohydrates.

Carbon dioxide stimulating life on earth.  No possible climate effect.  Carbon dioxide is at a Prix industrial two parts per million.  If we don't understand high school biology, shut the **** up about the climate.  You are a biological idiot.

Plants eat carbon

Fires stimulate plant growth

In 1880 the global carbon dioxide level in the afternoon air, was limitted to just two parts per million, by the action of plants.

Where they would suck Ian available carbon dioxide, and converted into plant biomass during the day and night.  The the in just two PPM carbon dioxide in the afternoon air.

1 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+L→(Cₘ(H₂O)ₙ+mO₂-E)+r(He+O+E²+X-ray)

So during daylight hours around the temperate earth plans converts come dioxide into carbohydrates of life.  Mankind's carbon emissions represent chest and additional 0.0004% daily, so much less important than ever falconer corruption of forest fire.

I did not foresee that the suppose the 'climate scientists' was suddenly gets a taste for arson, setting forest fires!

To get fresh water to a steam engine fires, the fireman Ken use an salts or home to suck up seawater by one metre.  And fill the water tanks with the water vapour.  Which is after all salts and contaminants.

Or we can spray the water vapour director of the forest fires, and extinguish them.

Though all the time plant's locally on land and sea, experienced an massive growth spurt!  So within three days all that lovely carbon dioxide is is plant biomass.

The most static two PPM carbon dioxide in the global air.  The 'climate scientists' are trashed the local community, for nothing!

Above the polar ice In winter we have the lowest natural temperatures on earth - down to -80° C above the Antarctic ice sheet.  Where there is no photosynthesis!  The photosynthesis in the seas around the earth it is given a boost naturally every year.

Increasing rates of plant and algal growth.  The leading to higher fish populations!  But in the spring the ice melts, and we are back to the global average of two PPM carbon dioxide.

The forest fire is increase our local carbon dioxide levels four and and three days.  No fossil global significance!  Our weather is made in the stratosphere, where mankind's carbon dioxide never reaches.

There is just 2.5 PPM/m³ carbon dioxide in the stratosphere.  Ejected there previously by explosive volcanic eruptions.

So there will see a massive increase in volcanic eruptions!  Which are caused so much human suffering and death.  The way to prevent volcanic eruptions is to drill down to the driving steam filled magma chamber.

And vent the steam gradually through a release valve.  Driving the dormant volcano extinct.  To we really clever we pass the steam through a little steam turbine, and freeze carbon zero electricity.

Provided by the wasted radioactive processes of the earth's interior.  So we never see any radioactivity!  Just free electricity.

My old PH D supervisor professor Z, I was away five years ago air trying to think of another reason for climate change.  Accepting that photosynthesis Free E carbon dioxide at just two parts per million.

I never did hear back from him!  The growing financial backer of man made climate change, is hyper toxic uranium nuclear power.

That should be more concerned with practicing the annual 100 billion our power plant insurance.  They carry a criminally insufficient 50 million.

There being no source so many insurers, over one billion.  So all $22 nuclear power plants running criminally under insured.  The UN has the legal imperative to step in and shut down every nuclear power plant on earth.

Limit to life

The limit to life around the earth is available carbon dioxide in the air for plants to metabolise in photosynthesis. A combine it with water to form carbohydrates: greeting the surplus oxygen.
Animals breathe in this gas and combine it with the carbohydrates which came from plant matter. The breathe out carbon dioxide. And this stimulates plant growth.
At the end of the cretaceous 90% of life on earth died due to insufficient carbon dioxide. Life I only got over this problem when more animals existed to create more carbon dioxide.
Mankind’s carbon dioxide has increased life on earth. But he’s has not increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air, which is pegged by photosynthesis.
Nuclear power dreamt up man made climate change: which is biological rubbish based on a fictitious rise of carbon dioxide in the air. Which can never happen.
Man has increased life on earth. It is outside his power to affect the level of carbon dioxide in the air. Is carbon emissions amount to 0.0000175% daily.
So every day there are more plants to convert carbon dioxide into life. There isn’t our more carbon dioxide in the air. For the last two centuries carbon dioxide levels have been static at two parts per 1,000,000.

Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com

No increase in CO2

By JonThm9@aol.com 

Most of the world is undeveloped land in the countryside. There is a massive excess of photosynthetic plants. These had taken in all mankind’s carbon dioxide and converted into new life on earth. So the global average carbon dioxide level in the air has not changed due to man.
Harvard University did a global survey from 2008 to 2010 confirmed this. Is a prediction of high school biology. While there is sufficient minerals and water the limit to life on earth is available carbon dioxide in the air.
Man has increased the level of carbon dioxide in the air by 0.0000175% daily seem to industry of revolution. This is not pumping out carbon dioxide. Nature has not even noticed we have evolved. We are that unimportant.
The might have been weather is affected by global average level of carbon dioxide in the air. So in other words, is not been affected at all. Is no mechanism by which carbon dioxide amount two parts per 1,000,000 to have any impact on the weather anyway.
In cities new scientist published 2004 that carbon dioxide had risen to 3.7ppm. This could have had no impact on the weather. The preindustrial level was 2ppm. Life at this out on the Internet, suddenly the climate people are saying the real figure is 3 the70ppm. Exactly 100 times greater. With no personal point. It knocks totally fabricated.
Limit to life on earth is available carbon dioxide. In city Parks we spraying fertilizer and initiate the soil. So this means grass would grow by 10 centimetres a day. Rather than to millimetres a month.
Watching the grass grow would be a high intensity sport activity. During your lunch hour ago to a city park and water that he knows of may and with sythes hacking their way through the verdant plants of the city Parks.
The cities would be 10,000 times more fertile than the largest rainforest. 370ppm is still only 0. 0037 percent. All the date of the extra infrared absorbency by air starts the carbon dioxide at 2%. That is a whole basis for global warming.
I fly around the world. None of it is warming. American scientists say the global climate has been cooling for 13 years. The climate pundits say year on year carbon dioxide emissions have been growing since 1986: the year off Chernobyl. Where nuclear power started putting money into the discredited science of global warming.
Europe has been significantly cooling since 2005 hence the sudden change of the PR fiction to the man made climate change. Suddenly carbon dioxide is making the world wetter and cooler. Climate change is scientist are missing the carbon dioxide has no effect on the climate.
My conclusion in 2001, were said global warming was fiction by nuclear power. And suddenly my PH D was ended for no reason. In contravention of the universe C statute: which gave me the legal right to see a written explanation within six months. After 10 years I am still waiting.
And the world is still cooling. And carbon dioxide is still at home free industrial 2ppm.

To be green

By JonThm9@aol.com

To boost plant growth in the greenhouse, gardener is often use a low flame of natural gas. This at hot, moist carbon dioxide laden air to the greenhouse. The green plants take in there carbon dioxide and water, and do photosynthesis. Burning gas is as green as it gets!
Nuclear fission from uranium is very dangerous. Go ask Tokyo which has just been trash by Fukushima. It will totally depopulate in the next century, and not be RE inhabited by nature 100,000 years.
Nuclear power seized on carbon dioxide at the differentiating factor between themselves and conventional power. They hadn’t realized carbon dioxide is the gas of life. And he is lot factor to life on earth.
Harvard University did a two year worldwide survey of carbon dioxide levels. They found that carbon dioxide in the countryside all over the world was still at the preindustrial two parts per 1,000,000. This is has taught by high school biology. There is a massive excess of green plants around the world.
If we have 2% carbon dioxide in the air, we might see some effect on the infrared properties of the air. Not at the present 0.00002%. Even in cities there is only a transient level of 0.0037%. Interestingly enough, the 370ppm reading had no location, date or time information attached to it.
Really it is just a number plant after the air by nuclear power. It still would have no effect on the world weather. But city air, even at from around engine’s, crosses over into the countryside where he creates more life.
So the vast bulk of air and the world only house 0.00002% carbon dioxide in. A level that has remained static for last two centuries. It was last higher in the little ice age. So carbon dioxide obviously does not cause global warming.
The world has been cooling since 1998. So the proponents of man made climate change are writing total fiction on behalf of nuclear power. The most toxic, polluting and uneconomic way man has found to generate power.
Winter turbines are as dear. But very safe, and do not produce plutonium.
Biology get its power from molecular nuclear fusion. Where fluid turbulence turns water into helium and oxygen gas plus a load of heat. Four times as much heat as toxic nuclear fission. Which nature does not do. As he is too dangerous.
Now in blackpool they have found that passing steam around underground shales releases natural gas: a process called for wrecking. This actually turns carbohydrates fossilised at the end of the Jurassic, when the dinosaurs died, into methane, helium and free radical oxygen.
We need to separate the methane from the oxygen before there is any possible source of combustion. Then we have a century is power produced by burning natural gas. Which will increase life on earth.
Nuclear power is not green. It is unless fatal technology mankind has devise. The enemy of life. At seeks to kill us all. Global warming is fiction from the last millennia. Man made climate change is a biological impossibility.
As confirmed by Harvard University, there is been no increase in the global average carbon dioxide around the earth. City levels are too minuscule, localised and transient to have any affect on the weather.
Carbon dioxide is the gas of life: as you were taught in high school biology age 14.

Global warming impossible

By JonThm9@aol.com
Is; they do not know biology Mankind has emitted more carbon dioxide from the cities of the world, via his machines. Initially from coal burning, then of boiling gas. We start at own base level of two parts per 1,000,000 after the little ice age ended. Carbon dioxide was at twice its level in the little ice age: when there were fewer plants about.
That air travels to above the countryside, and he’s taken in by green plants to do photosynthesis. More carbon dioxide on day one, more green plants to take in a gas on day two. So we are stuck with a level of 2ppm.
The increase of carbon dioxide is via the year. The growth by green plants in by the day. We may see higher carbon dioxide levels over cities at engine exhausts, for once at air travel to above the countryside we are back to the preindustrial 2ppm.
Who argues with this high school biology? A from the starboard did in 1999. There is scientist should really not be in education. Harvard University looked in 2008 to 2010 and found there was no increase in carbon dioxide in the countryside for last 200 years.
There couldn’t be! We get more plant growth. We never get more carbon dioxide in the air. So who devised the phantom science of global warming? Nuclear power. Who had just suffered Chernobyl.
They suddenly start talking biology in order to get new plants. The trouble is, they do not know biology. And so picked on carbon dioxide-the gas of life. That is taken in dynamically to support life on earth. There is no way he you could ever increase of carbon dioxide in the air outside of an ice age.
The major ice age of the Permian carbon dioxide was at 10ppm. The little ice age it was at 4ppm. If you stayed awake; you will realise there carbon dioxide does obviously not cause global warming. Nuclear power probably does.
Nature does not do toxic nuclear fission. Only mankind is stupid enough to attempt it. Fukushima shows the folly of this endeavour. Nuclear power is toxic, polluting and fatal. Are you listening Stamford?
Carbon dioxide is the gas of life. It is the limit to life on earth. You can never have A global increase in this gas. So man made global warming and climate change were devised an ideas without the ever being a global increase in carbon dioxide.
Nuclear plants sprayed research money around to write academic papers on global warming. Then in 1998 the natural climate started cooling. Enter climate change. To say the natural weather was caused by a biologically impossible rise of carbon dioxide in the air.
People who believe this rubbish need of medical attention.

Global warming impossible

By JonThm9@aol.com

Is; they do not know biology Mankind has emitted more carbon dioxide from the cities of the world, via his machines. Initially from coal burning, then of boiling gas. We start at own base level of two parts per 1,000,000 after the little ice age ended. Carbon dioxide was at twice its level in the little ice age: when there were fewer plants about.
That air travels to above the countryside, and he’s taken in by green plants to do photosynthesis. More carbon dioxide on day one, more green plants to take in a gas on day two. So we are stuck with a level of 2ppm.
The increase of carbon dioxide is via the year. The growth by green plants in by the day. We may see higher carbon dioxide levels over cities at engine exhausts, for once at air travel to above the countryside we are back to the preindustrial 2ppm.
Who argues with this high school biology? A from the starboard did in 1999. There is scientist should really not be in education. Harvard University looked in 2008 to 2010 and found there was no increase in carbon dioxide in the countryside for last 200 years.
There couldn’t be! We get more plant growth. We never get more carbon dioxide in the air. So who devised the phantom science of global warming? Nuclear power. Who had just suffered Chernobyl.
They suddenly start talking biology in order to get new plants. The trouble is, they do not know biology. And so picked on carbon dioxide-the gas of life. That is taken in dynamically to support life on earth. There is no way he you could ever increase of carbon dioxide in the air outside of an ice age.
The major ice age of the Permian carbon dioxide was at 10ppm. The little ice age it was at 4ppm. If you stayed awake; you will realise there carbon dioxide does obviously not cause global warming. Nuclear power probably does.
Nature does not do toxic nuclear fission. Only mankind is stupid enough to attempt it. Fukushima shows the folly of this endeavour. Nuclear power is toxic, polluting and fatal. Are you listening Stamford?
Carbon dioxide is the gas of life. It is the limit to life on earth. You can never have A global increase in this gas. So man made global warming and climate change were devised an ideas without the ever being a global increase in carbon dioxide.
Nuclear plants sprayed research money around to write academic papers on global warming. Then in 1998 the natural climate started cooling. Enter climate change. To say the natural weather was caused by a biologically impossible rise of carbon dioxide in the air.
People who believe this rubbish need of medical attention.