France to experience the next nuclear disaster

Zut alore!

Without a shadow of doubt the most dangerous nuclear facilities are the oldest!   An engineers design nuclear funds with a 25 year life span.  Feastmilt replacement of injuring components does not really help!

In the 1980s I won a Condor VIC20 computer.  That used in railroad television as its display device.   I actually succeeded in getting a Victoria 20 computer programme published by a personal computing magazine.

This explains why after graduating with a master's degree in dermatology and engineering, I was suddenly offered a job in it while Lloyds Bank.  My idea was that you spoke the name of the person you wanted to call, And the computer connected you through the telephone network.

This is an almost trivial system to set up today.  But when I propose the idea it blew out the brains of the computer Reporters at The Times  newspaper.  This was 1982!

Now I run a Windows 11 laptop with a 600 megabyte hard disc.  And its output is high definition obviously.

Uranium nuclear fire vans are designed around the world within a 25 year life expectancy.  In France they go for fish mill engineering component replacements. And run that nuclear facilities for 40 years.  Fukushima happened in Tokyo as an earthquake causes tsunami that destroyed a fresh ice water reactor nuclear plant.

Closing 100 billion of imminent damage.  The resulting human deaths in Asia will manifest themselves over the next 20 years.  That is 200 little trillion in fiats the nuclear consortia will have to make.

Their nuclear insurance was just 50 little million.  Insurance of obtained sufficient before Windscale in 1978.  Any feed of your nuclear reactor needs annual insurance cover of 100 billion.  There have been no global insurance one billion available around the world.

Four hundred and twenty two surviving nuclear vans each knees that insurance cover of 100 billion.  A total insurance requirement of 400 trillion.  On our flight only worth 130 trillion!

The oldest French nuclear plant still operating today is not Fessenheim, which has been shut down. Instead, reactors at the Tricastin nuclear power plant, commissioned in 1980 and 1981, have been granted permission to continue operating beyond their initial 40-year lifespan after undergoing safety assessments. 

So the oldest fans are the most dangerous!  There are benefits of continuously breaking, And it is an offhill fossil to constantly replace the thoughts which are going to break.  The cost of such and Latin rifles and skill was never in the original nuclear plant bid documents.

I would estimate that keeping a nuclear power plant going after 24 years is 300 little million a year.  In excess of the 250,000,000 operating profit.  So every aged nuclear plant is making an annual net loss of 50 million.

The obvious way to cut down on maintenance costs is to do only the absolute mineral maintenance to prevent a trifle core meltdown.  The chiffon has demonstrated cost the nuclear operator 100 billion.  Most of the in excess of the criminally insufficient 50 little million of annual insurance their nuclear operator carriers.

So the nuclear operator declares bankruptcy.  How did the nuclear arm of Westinghouse after Three Mile Island in America.  America also carrying the sale 200 nuclear reactors within the states, But America has some of the best engineers in the world whereas the French are cheese eating surrender monkeys.

The French EDF Uh automatically for the VID consortium in every nuclear power plant in the world.  For Cherie to invite five tonnes of Brie cheese and 20 white flags to declare immediate surrender in any military campaign.  Just keep the French individuals the hell away from nuclear power.

Tricastin nuclear power plant Has exceeded its 40 year French operating life.  If French people are getting increasingly unhappy about nuclear fire within French territories.  So the French are flying to build their next nuclear facility in Belgium!

They throw the unequivocal is such that a nuclear incident in France will make the whole of France and south of England uninhabitable forever.  And again I would remind you there is no sufficient 100 billion of insurance cover available around the world.

And nuclear incident in France will kill most of the inaccess of the 60 million killed in the Second World War.  Sir country dedicated to running their nuclear plants beyond twice the globally accepted nuclear front life.

The Arrange abandoned their gas called reactors to adopt the globally utilised pressurised water reactors.  That caused Chernobyl and Fukushima.  Chernobyl caused by mishandled safety inspection in 1986 .

Fukushima The result of an underwater earthquake in a Pacific Ring of Fire.  Japanese cultures are taught to duck and duck and dive when there is an inevitable regular earthquake.

Causing the glovely inevitable tsunamis.  France has a huge tourism industry.  Which I have enjoyed since being in 11 year old school child in Bordeaux.  Just one nuclear incident and the hull arranged to assume wiped out forever.

Will France win the race for the next nuclear incident.  America and France having 200 reactors each,  Though America having the best engineers.

That nuclear France turned to fell in unpredictable fashions!  If you are thinking of a holiday home in France, W to wear your biohazard nuclear clothing to Protect against the inevitable next nuclear incident.

France, tu es vraiment dans la merde. Au revoir.  This says 'France you are so screwed.   Good bye.

Home carbon zero pays

Nuclear SO illegal

My friend in America practically confirmed that a 30x1.5cm non pressurise steam plasma all is a massive carbon zero heat source.  As the plasma did physical molecular nuclear fusion.

1 H₂O+PL→2(E²+L+(X-ray)) E²=1 megawatt of heat

He did not confirm that the plasma emitted a lower power harmless X rays.  He did confirm the a 30 cm steam plasma release a constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.  That is so energetic!  80 times as dynamic as a flame of gas or oil.  Which amazingly enough was proved in 19 eighty's to do physical molecular nuclear fusion.

2 CₘHₙ+pO₂+flame→mCO₂+(n-r)H₂O+r(He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+E+L+X-ray)

A1 metre row of oil or gas burners releases just 45 kW of heat.  All free using loads of carbon dioxide.

Which has no residency in the air!  As photosynthesis on land and sea eats carbon dioxide during the day - the idea are the late emeritus Professor Bernard Argent.

As green plants'use infrared light to build carbohydrates.  As they do biological molecular nuclear fusion: A process we erroneously call photosynthesis.  It is really nature doing nuclear fusion in light.

3 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+Lir+chlorophyll→(Cₘ(H₂O)ₙ+O₂)+r(He+O+Lb+E+X-ray)

Photosynthesis goes on in the plant photo blast.  Which during the day under infrared light at 80nm, gives out X rays.  As the plant produces helium and free radical oxygen gas.  The oxygen bonding with oxygen molecules in the air to form ozone O₃

There being no biochemical source of helium.  We have to be doing nuclear fusion as to build the carbohydrates of life.

The X rays to bond with other carbohydrates to enrich the carbon isotope.  The basis behind the wildly inaccurate carbon dates.

4 ⁱ²C+2 X-ray→ⁱ⁴C which are very unreliable, as running water also releases X rays as it does physical molecular nuclear fusion.

5 H₂O+TU+O₂→He+O₃+X-ray

So river rapids or waterfalls over one metre high, constantly releasing helium and ozone gases with X rays.  As to beat bogs!  So artefacts buried in last 50 years, within living memory carbon date to 2000 years ago!

Nurse geography is full of nuclear fusion on earth.  I really we need other data or evidence.  Like date linked technology or of coin with a date stamp.

Academic still invoked carbon dates as if they are set in stone.  Even though they are manifestly inaccurate.  For any of the carbon date thousands of years wrong!  Only civilisation that did not have interesting 19th or 20th century technology.

Building a uranium nuclear power plant, uses a fossil fuel burn on concrete to free use its cement.  For its reinforced concrete structure.  Releasing the two years our power plant construction the Covent carbon emissions from operating a commercially fired power plant for 25 years.

So nuclear power very much not carbon zero!  Mankind's fourth largest source of carbon emissions.  Which is not a problem, as within 5 minutes the next day, fans within a kilometre radius have metabolise the carbon dioxide into carbohydrates.  Plant biomass.

Having no possible effect on the whirl climate.

The whirl climate has 28 year periods or warming and cooling.  Just like all the planets in the inner cellar system.  Incidentally cured as red sports is powered by physical molecular nuclear fusion.

6 2H+P+TU→E+Lr+X-ray

Jupiter's equatorial X-ray emissions over two solar cycles

Oxford Academic

https://academic.oup.com › mnras › article

by AD Wibisono · 2023 · Cited by 3 — Jupiter's disc is bright in X-rays as H2 molecules in the atmosphere are very effective at scattering solar X-rays. K-shell fluorescence from carbon atoms in ...

So Jupiter's red spot shines like a little sun.

It is us no surprise that lightening in its X rays and visible light plus heat, as it does physical molecular nuclear fusion.

Set up by heavy rain or snow storms around the world also doing physical molecular nuclear fusion.  Even at -50° C above the north pole.

7 H₂O+P+TU+O₂→He²⁺+O⁺+3e⁻+L+X-ray+O₂ the positive charge collects on the cloud tops.  And the negative charge falls with electrons to the ground.  Which is why heavy storms feel electric!  They are.

Each 1.5 KM x2cm lightening volts is set up to discharge and 5000 volts 100 amps of electrical potential.  Created by all the nuclear fusion the storm is doing.

Which produces five tonnes of helium ions of the base of a lightening strike: thanks to the geographers who ran papers on this subject.  Giving us an energy release of 1.2 megawatts/m from a lightening strike.  Entirely consistent though my contact 1 MW our carbon zero heat produce 530 CM steam plasma in a glass cylinder.

Carbon zero is really that simple!  The home user can invest 1500 UK pounds into 65 kW thermoelectric generator.  Entirely consistent with the energy release from a lightening strike.  Which is a natural source or non nuclear X-rays.

Thermoelectric Generator For Biomass Stove(65+)

Alibaba

https://www.alibaba.com › ... › Stoves

Find wholesale thermoelectric generator for biomass stove, semiconductor chips, and other electronic components at Alibaba.com.

5.0(27) · 30-day returns   

The thermoelectic generator has an efficiency of 13%.  Hence 65 kW of three phase mains linked AC current.  An annual income from the power company of 180,000 UK pounds a year.

We can rent the generator for 125 pounds a month.  Month for again income of 15,000 UK pounds.  So pay off the generator month one.

In the UK every eight house needs the plasma power plant in an ice house or the cellar/attic.  And guess that lovely 65 kW of carbon zero AC electricity.

The generator is sold with the electronics to turn the DC current into three phase mains linked AC electricity.  The national grid links every eight house to the next AC current phase.

To shed using AC current so much more efficient and DC electricity - which use to cause a lot of fires.

So here we use a captive lightening strike in a glass centre: started at user high voltage electronics from old fluorescent light.  Once started the plasma self sustains while we hours just 10⁻ⁱ⁶cc of regular water to the plasma every year.

So we produce a massive excess of carbon zero electricity.  Getting us a check for 180,000 UK pounds every year.  For all plant costing under 2000 pounds to set up and get working.

We have no boiler room, and no fossil fuel burn.  More importantly every some other hyper toxic plutonium and strontium produced by uranium nuclear power.

Since Chernobyl in 1986 they are required annual insurance cover of 40 billion UK pounds.  The rising to 100 billion per uranium nuclear power plant, after Chernobyl in 2010.

The nuclear regulator has the legal imperative to ensure nuclear plants carry sufficient insurance cover.  But there is no available in defining commercial cover above one billion: and the nuclear operator has to buy external insurance cover.  Only they haven't followed!

All surviving 441 nuclear plants all operating criminally under insured.  Converting the dangerous enriched uranium, into the hyper toxic plutonium and strontium.  Though RE at definition of corporate illegality.

And the academics are not allowed to get research funding from illegal corporations.  And or nuclear power is horrendously under insured.  And I is as illegal as it gets.

So no academic she had received nuclear power funding since 1986 - the year of Chernobyl.  WHEN ALL NUCLEAR POWER lapsed into illegal operation.  And I have never got the required insurance cover.

As it is not globally available.

Trying to extending nuclear power plant life illegal

Nuclear - get insured or shut down

Every nuclear power plant knees operating consent.  Which is strictly time limited.  As engineers over design nothing.  A nuclear power plants are designed to last 25 years, then be decommissioned.

The Fukushima incident in Japan demonstrates what happens if you ran a nuclear power plant beyond its design life: it fills in a catastrophic fashion!

Since Fukushima in 2010 every uranium nuclear power plant has needed annual operating insurance of 100 billion.  There being no insurance available above one billion, they make do a criminally insufficient 50 million.

The legal fine for missing insurance is the cumulative some of although missing insurance.  100 billion a year since 2010.  EDF in the UK is faced as nuclear plants exceeding the design life.

Only Sizewell B is still operating within its design life.  But without the legally required insurance cover.  Since Chernoby in 1986 the operating insurance was set at 40 billion.  Then a 100 billion after Fukushima in 2010.

So Sizewell B has only has the legally required insurance cover for two years of its operating life.  The nuclear inspector in the UK should have shut down every uranium nuclear plant operating without adequate insurance.

EDF cannot simply extend the life of out of operation nuclear power plants.  Engineer designed each plant designed to wear out.  And it would require another 10 million planning meeting. and a total rebuild to recommence opertion.

Every out of use the nuclear plant should be shut down and scrapped.  EDF has no magical power to some how extend the life of a shut down nuclear power plant.

King Charles III has emailed me personally to say he is strongly against uranium nuclear power.  The missing insurance was highlighted in my university undergraduate essay 1984.

Despite my essay circulating in engineering, nuclear power has never tried to get legal insurance: for rare good reason there is not available!

Operating nuclear power plant beyond its design life is in contravention of its operating consent, just plain illegal!

There will be no new nuclear power plant in Kent.  As it could never get the required an annual insurance cover.  And would require its own new planning consent: which would automatically tell the EDF to **** off. 

Nuclear power operating illegally

no storage for nuclear waste

I pointed out repeatedly recently that since Fukushima in 2010 the annual insurance cover required for 100 MW nuclear power plant, and has been raised to 100 billion.  The insurance was raised to 40 billion in 1986 after Chernobyl.

There is no commercial source of insurance over one billion.  So nuclear power has resulted to bribing the nuclear regulator not to enforce this condition of the planning consent.

No adequate insurance, no nuclear power plant can operate!

Three years ago air the storage space for used uranium fission rods was full.  Initially nuclear power uses a short term storage space outside disused nuclear power plants.  Which totally lacks insurance cover for that use!

Such storage areas were designed to short term storage of new fusion rods.  They were never licensed for long term nuclear of storage.  By now all such illegal storage areas will be full.

So what is nuclear power doing with its use uranium fission rods.  Some the obviously illegal!  As is no legal storage capability in the world.

Without legal storage for its use fission rods, uranium nuclear us to shut down.  And never restart.