Friday 1 April 2022

Firms make gas and petrol

CO2 → plant life on Earth

When the regret is I am no longer attached to the chemical industry!  So I can't doubt the use this idea.  The French scientist Sebatier was awarded the 1912 noble prize, for devising the hydrogenation of carbon dioxide, to make methane!  This means adding hydrogen to carbon dioxide, to produce natural gas.

At the time the world was using town gas.

coal gas, gaseous mixture—mainly hydrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide—formed by the destructive distillation (i.e., heating in the absence of air) of bituminous coal and used as a fuel.

Natural gas, (mainly methane), has very different burning properties from manufactured gas and it was necessary to adapt or replace every gas appliance in Britain (around 20 million)! The conversion started in 1967 and took ten years to complete.

Hence the little interest shown in the Novell.  It really is life changing science!

1 CO₂+3H₂+(Al)+T→CH₄+2H₂O+(Al) T> 380 degrees C.  B aluminium is not used up - it is a catalyst.

Nuclear power has 18 natural gas for decades!  It's easy as the big obstacle to the adoption of more nuclear power plants.  That is rubbish!

Since Chernobyl every uranium nuclear power plant around the world, has needed annual insurance cover of 40 billion.  Rising to 100 billion after Fukushima.  Without such insurance every nuclear power plant on earth must stop instantly!  A job for the UN.

Why then is the U.N. hosting annual conferences on carbon dioxide?  They have had been bought off by nuclear power.

Who fail to mention that the production of into nuclear power plant, involves no fossil fuel heating are massive amounts of limestone - to produce concrete.  Making an active nuclear power building programme mankind's fourth largest source of carbon dioxide.

But we can use the 1912 patent, to manufacture methane in chemical plants.  Ici in particular can produce all the European requirement for natural gas, in three months!

We start off with the production of free electricity: which really are void so the need to burn or oil and gas!  We use a steam plasma.  The practical experiments will family done for me by a contact in America.  I have been screaming at my PH D supervisor to do the experiments, at his chair of chemically engineering was paid for by uranium nuclear power!

My contact found that a 30x1cm steam plasma would freeze a constant 1 MW of heat.  Presumably as atmospheric pressure!  I calculated steam plasma at four atmospheres, would produce 2.4 MW.

So we pump to the steam plasma in a water boiler, an run a steam turbine.  And get out there ½ MW of DC current: the transforming into AC mains synchronised electricity.

We use a tiny fraction of this to do the electrolysis of water, to form a hydrogen and oxygen gases.  Oxygen has highly commercial value anyway!

We use some of the free current to run a car no refrigeration cycle, where the compression of the gas heats it up, and we lose their heat to the moment, all we had to utilise it in the gas making programme.

We condense carbon dioxide as the air at -20° C.  So now we have carbon dioxide and hydrogen.  At which stage we need to heat the gases up.  Using the heat from the refrigeration cycle.

We wander over 380° C.  And pass the gas is over a helical aluminium catalyst.  And now we get the Sebatier reaction - 1!  We get off methane and water.

More car no cooling I am afraid!  We produce a liquid methane - basically odourless natural gas.  Which has a highly commercial value today!  And ICI can produce it by their hundreds of tonnes an hour.

Is is a carbon neutral gas - as we form device sucking carbon dioxide as the air.  Where you burn the gas in high pressure - we get back the carbon dioxide - but converts some other hydrogen atoms into helium, with heat light and X rays.

2 CH₄+P+spark+3O₂→(CO₂-E)+(2-r)H₂O+r(He+O+L+X-ray)

And the emission of X rays and light from burning fossil fuels is on record!  There is no chemical source of light and X rays.  And oxidise the carbon takes in energy.  But the nuclear fusion we are doing produces helium and oxygen gases, with a light and X rays!

So a flame of fossil fuels is it doing nuclear fusion!  Which professor Z described as nuclear fusion, and professor argent turned molecular nuclear fusion.

As he was using hydrogen ions from molecules!  So the gas will only burn under pressure!  By the absence of pressure carbon dioxide and hydrogen unburn!  Giving us methane and water molecules.

Now ICI can use the Sebatier reaction, to produce almost limitless natural gas.  That is a carbon neutral fuel.  Which is science familiar to every chemist in chemical engineer on the planet.

In the same way he low pressure diesel oil will not burn - but highly pressure and diesel oil spontaneously ignites.  So now we're not with Anton fossil gas sources.

Any small engineering company can make 'natural' gas.

If we pass the methane repeatedly threw an an aluminium honeycomb catalyst fuel oil drips out.  Carbon12 is diesel, and carbon16 is petrol.  So small chemical firms can make diesel and petrol oil.

It is really not hard science!  And now we have a carbon free source of heat and electricity - A steam plasma.  Which does not utilised any toxic radioactive isotopes.  He Prix uses no uranium or strontium radioactive waste.

Just clean carbon zero heat and electricity.  I felt so C1 in the body would wish to burn or oil and gas.

Which fire up a steam plasma!  Just use the high voltage electronics from old fluorescent light, and striker the plasma without the carbon atom.  And my American friend got 1 MW of heat from a 30x1cm steam plasma.

Which will allow the home scientist, to produce the carbon neutral mains electricity for 60 houses.  And the exit steam after the turbine, will provide free space heating for the same dwellings.

Totally free of Opec or Russia.  Present uranium nuclear power requires annual insurance cover of 100 billion to operate legally.  They carry a criminally insufficient 50 million.

And credit where credit is due: the construction of a nuclear power plant with its United's fourth largest source of carbon emissions!  Then he uranium nuclear power is so not carbon zero!

No comments: