Free carbon zero heat and power

free carbon 0 heat & power

When you burn natural gas, actually oxidising the carbon takes in a loss of the heat.  But we fire up a steam plasma, and this turns regular steam into helium and oxygen gases, with massive heat and even X rays.

We have to be doing nuclear fusion, as is no chemical source of X rays, visible light and helium.  And there is no source of radioactive decay!

1 CH₄+4O₂→(CO₂+(2-r)H₂O-E+r(He+O+E²+X-ray)

So really we would prefer to cut the carbon fuel edge of the loop.  And using a high voltage electronics from old fluorescent light, they can just fire up the steam plasma - that releases light and heat.

2 H₂O+de/dT→He+O+e⁻+e⁺E²+L...X-ray welcome to molecular nuclear fusion!  And spin off a free electrons and also are every positron!  Which is a massive free positive charge.  So stalls generate free electrons and positrons!

Every 3 minutes around the world heavy rain or snow does molecular nuclear fusion.  Where the turbulence of the precipitation term as water into the usual even oxygen, with massive heat and X rays.

3 3H₂O+P+TU→He₂⁺+O³⁺+2OH⁻+3e⁻+E²+L...X-ray

The 2OH⁻, hydroxyl molecules are interesting.

3 2OH⁻+e⁻+TU→H₂O+n⁰

We are funded one of the positrons with the negative charge from two hydroxyl molecules, to form water and a neutron.  I would either side of aswer the imagination is more important than knowledge.

Yet strangely enough santis have written academic papers on the antil massive generation of rain clouds.  So it is established scientific knowledge!

Thunderstorms Make Antimatter | Science Mission Directoratehttps://science.nasa.gov › science-news › science-at-nasa

11 Jan 2011 — The detection of positrons shows many high-energy particles are being ejected from the atmosphere. In fact, scientists now think that all TGFs ...

And he positron it is the antibody equivalent of the negatively charged electrons.  Confusingly given the scientific notation e⁺.  So there is a lot of interesting stuff goes on in clouds!

And although nuclear fusion is throwing out positively charged ions, and negatively charged electrons.  Although positive charge collects above the clouds layer.  Which acts as a great Ladon charge collector.  Great 18th century science!

The electrons carry the negative charge to the ground.  And at 5000 volts 100 amps, A partial steam plasma the links up the cloud tops and the ground, with a 1.5km x 2cm partial steam plasma.

Which makes 5 tonnes of helium ions.  A quick relativistic conversion the tax as that is 2.5x10³⁰W of power!  But you don't want calculations, your practical results.

My American friend on benefits fired up a 30x1.5cm the steam plasma, Annie get the 1 MW of carbon zero heat.  He did not pressurise the plasma, but once fired up the pressure massive shot up above the pressure needed to self sustain.

So every year we utilised just 3x10⁻ⁱ⁶cc of regular water.  To create a constant 1 MW of heat.  Burning fossil fuels only releases 45 kW/m of oil or gas burners.

Here a 30cm the steam plasma will freeze a constant 1 MW of heat.  Totally carbon zero!  Professor Z they intention to continue thinking about nuclear fusion, as he ended my PH D work for no reason in 2001.  I have already got a master's in metallurgy and engineering.  Very useful!

So we have a carbon zero heat source.  22 times as dynamic as burning of oil and gas.  Utilising a plasma at a stroke water molecules into massive heat, with light and lower power X rays.  All totally carbon zero!  Utilising two little water ever to measure in a lifetime!

My friend steam plasma will shine for the rest of his life!  Releasing massive heat and light.

So we immerse it in a water boiler.  And produce steam at 800° C8 atmospheres pressure.  And generate 1.2 MW of carbon zero electricity.  Or we can use a commercially sourced thermoelectric generator and use 75 kW of carbon zero electricity.

All regular houses meters 8 kW of electrical power on Christmas day.  So the national grid will pay us 210,000 UK pounds a year, for our excess current.

We utilised the exit steam to provide free space heating for the local area.  Again totally carbon zero.  Nuclear power made up man made global warming after Chernobyl in 1986.

To justify their existence!  At that stage every 100 MW nuclear power plant needed annual insurance cover of 40 billion.  No insurance above one billion is available.

So they do thriving the nuclear regulator to look the other way!  The most massive corporate crime in history.  Hence 2010 and Japan nuclear experienced Fukushima.

The required insurance then became 100 billion.  But nuclear power bills its plants using loads and loads of concrete.

Produced using a fossil fuel burn on limestone.  To drive of the carbon dioxide!  Making an active nuclear power building programme man cannot fourth largest source of carbon dioxide.

So nuclear power is so not carbon zero!  In contrast are steam plasma is carbon zero, or very nearly.  Utilising no enriched uranium.  The plasma enriches its own water isotopes.

So the plasma burns regular water into massive heat with light and lower power X rays.  All totally carbon neutral!  And so very nearly cost free.

So the garage hobbyist can produce 75 kW of carbon zero electricity.  Getting a income of 210,000 UK pounds a year.

So the next uel by a little steam turbine, and generate 1.2 MW of carbon zero electricity.  From a garden shed!  Utilising no fossil fuel burn.  Burning two little regular water ever to measure in a lifetime.

Or set off by the ideas of professor Z into nuclear fusion.  Or rather the ideas of Dr. Z.  Where nuclear power bought him a of the chair of Chemical Engineering, he lost interest in nuclear fusion!

I am lucky.  The following a car accident a legally supervise trust fund, finances my future.  I do not need to worry about money.

So instead and free to tell the world have plasma burn from steam, is carbon zero cost free heat and power.