carbon dates are wrong

Carbon dating - what a laugh

The idea is that growing organisms in some way lead to the isotope number more carbon being also from 12 to 14.  For reasons not explained.

In actual fact as plants on land and sea do photosynthesis, they are it do biological molecular nuclear fusion.  They are turning regular water molecules into helium and oxygen gases with emission of a faint blue light and X rays.

1 mCO₂+(n+r)H₂O+L→(Cₘ(H₂O)ₙ+mO₂)+r(He+O+E²+Lb+X-ray)

So during daylight hours green crops using infrared light from sunlight, at 80 nanometers to induce molecular nuclear fusion.  Producing the carbohydrates of life and the surplus oxygen - I was need to breathe in.  Also are freezing helium and free radical oxygen, plus a faint blue light and X rays.

The oxygen bonds with oxygen molecules, to produce the ozone we have all smiles in the countryside.

The turbulent flow of breaking sea water in ways, or pressure is as a round a sharp BA and in a river also do molecular nuclear fusion.  Releasing the X rays that sure some the half life of carbon 14.

2 H₂O+TU→He+O+E²+X-ray

This also goes on in the peat bogs where we can measure the xray production.  So artefacts varied and feeble can buy and or river, get a mass of the spurious carbon date!

As a carbon 14 indicates a carbon 12, as a far faster rate!  So he said a carbon dated 2000 years old, and the arts for his forehead within living memory.  50 years ago!

The most potent source of molecular nuclear fusion, is the combustion of plant carbohydrates.

3 Cₘ(H₂O)ₙ+mO₂+flame→mCO₂+(n-r)H₂O+r(He+O+E²+X-ray)

So the carbon 14 and a form CS to the base of fire, easy radiation for X rays.  So we C again are massively increased rate of carbon 14 decay.  So staff burnt in last century of carbon date to 3000° C.

We never took account of the nuclear fusion going on in nature.  So the carbon dates are laughably wrong!  The technology of the items around a fire are thousands of years in advance of the technology of that society supposedly.

All because we're relying on carbon dates!  There is a way to normalise these.  So yes usion this is my master's degree experience into Engineering Materials.

We use the phosphorus dates.  Where the decay of phosphorus 33 into phosphorus 31, goes along with four times the time period of carbon dates.  20,000 years rather than 5000!

Isotopes of phosphorus

Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Isotopes_of_phospho...

Although phosphorus (15P) has 22 isotopes from 26P to 47P, only 31P is stable; as such, phosphorus is considered a monoisotopic element.

‎List of isotopes · ‎Radioactive isotopes · ‎Phosphorus-32 · ‎Phosphorus-33

So the phosphorus date is shortened by the same ratio as social and Ian the carbon dates, according to the local X-ray environment.  So we can correct for natural sources of X rays.

And normalise the carbon dates!  Which are fortunate makes the past and lot more boring.  The great technological advances of money and the neolithic were actually from the late bronze age into the Roman age.

What we need to focus on here is that nature on earth does loads and loads of nuclear fusion.  Down to 0° C!  As only cellular of at pressure.  Really dependent on the turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam.

Which was the idea of professor Z.  Who gave me the idea for his uncle of the turbulent flow of high pressure water or steam doing nuclear fusion.

He was Dr. Z.  He was fought a chair of chemical and process engineering by uranium nuclear power.  The price for which was to lose interest in molecular nuclear fusion.  What a tragedy!

A release more guy.  Luckily he had given me ideas about nuclear fusion on earth.  And when taken to the carbon dating system, reveal that the of radioactive decay of carbon 14 into carbon 12, is very environmentally dependent.