By JonThm9@aol.com
In the little ice age there was less photosynthesis going on. So free carbon dioxide rose to 4ppm. Since then he’s has fallen to 2ppm. And SSTA static at this level for last 200 years. Man is carbon emissions have been taken in by plants, and used to expand the life on earth.
A static level of carbon dioxide in the air has no effect on the world climate. That is all lie from the base stooges to nuclear power. Who were desperate to distract people from Chernobyl. And dying to see what they do a Fukushima. They seem to totally ignoring the death of Tokyo, the world’s mega city.
That is what nuclear power turns. Kills and pollutes on a continental scale. Carbon dioxide results in more life on earth. Is has no effect on the world climate. Who ever thought it did is remedial in high school biology!
All the professors of physics who ever written papers about man made climate change are dangerous fantasist, who have no place in education. Animals only evolved due to a world shortage of carbon dioxide in the air. It cools there may get extinction of the cretaceous.
Monday, 21 November 2011
Saturday, 19 November 2011
Biology says the world
The Biology teaches that green plants metabolise carbon dioxide, forming carbohydrates and sugers, excreting the surplus oxygen. Nuclear power must be livid.
Be devised a whole scenario where mankind’s carbon emissions have affected the level of carbon dioxide in the air, and so the weather. They devised it the year off Chernobyl, to distract the world from their toxic nature.
Mankind’s carbon emissions have increased life on earth but not affected the level of carbon dioxide in the air: which is fixed by photosynthesis. There is a massive excess of photosynthetic life on earth.
As man releases more carbon dioxide, so plant life expands to take the gas in. Releasing carbon dioxide is the best thing man has ever done for life on earth. Do not doing nuclear fission from uranium is the worst.
There is no argument: anything in tension to biology’s carbon cycle is automatically wrong. The world cooled from 1998, so nuclear power devised man made climate change.
To predicts nothing. But blame the natural weather on a phantom rise in carbon dioxide in the air. It is wrong before you hear any more under theory. I have been asking an Internet, and nobody can be borrowed to further details.
As man made climate change is so obviously wrong. The high point of physics and injuring turns out to be their worst time! When they show up as nuclear stooges and the enemy of life.
Then we get mysterious readings of carbon dioxide, however hand and 50 times or more the level in the countryside. Obviously taking in an engine exhaust in the city’s. All volcanic vents are higher than tears away from biology.
These readings contradict biology again. And use two would result in plants growing 150 temperature in the city. Grass would grow by 10 centimetres a day. Not to millimetres a month. It is so allow for the stupid who came up with this rubbish?
The global average carbon dioxide number, the only important number to the weather, has not changed in 200 years: as predicted by biology.
I want arguments from idiots earning their living from beingf nuclear stooges.
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 3XQ
JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416
Biology says the world
Biology teaches that green plants metabolise carbon dioxide, forming carbohydrates and sugers, excreting the surplus oxygen. Nuclear power must be livid.
Be devised a whole scenario where mankind’s carbon emissions have affected the level of carbon dioxide in the air, and so the weather. They devised it the year off Chernobyl, to distract the world from their toxic nature.
Mankind’s carbon emissions have increased life on earth but not affected the level of carbon dioxide in the air: which is fixed by photosynthesis. There is a massive excess of photosynthetic life on earth.
As man releases more carbon dioxide, so plant life expands to take the gas in. Releasing carbon dioxide is the best thing man has ever done for life on earth. Do not doing nuclear fission from uranium is the worst.
There is no argument: anything in tension to biology’s carbon cycle is automatically wrong. The world cooled from 1998, so nuclear power devised man made climate change.
To predicts nothing. But blame the natural weather on a phantom rise in carbon dioxide in the air. It is wrong before you hear any more under theory. I have been asking an Internet, and nobody can be borrowed to further details.
As man made climate change is so obviously wrong. The high point of physics and injuring turns out to be their worst time! When they show up as nuclear stooges and the enemy of life.
Then we get mysterious readings of carbon dioxide, however hand and 50 times or more the level in the countryside. Obviously taking in an engine exhaust in the city’s. All volcanic vents are higher than tears away from biology.
These readings contradict biology again. And use two would result in plants growing 150 temperature in the city. Grass would grow by 10 centimetres a day. Not to millimetres a month. It is so allow for the stupid who came up with this rubbish?
The global average carbon dioxide number, the only important number to the weather, has not changed in 200 years: as predicted by biology.
I want arguments from idiots earning their living from beingf nuclear stooges.
Jonathan Thomason JonThm9@aol.com
Noble truths
A good academic jealously guards the truth: when ever they find a scientist in their field working in a fictitious area, they have a duty to inform the world.
Man made climate change is a biological impossibility. Any scientist is aware of this has a duty to inform the world of the error.
There has been no increase in carbon dioxide in the air due to man. Any additional carbon dioxide is converted that day into new life.
If there was 300ppm of carbon dioxide in the air during the rush hour, plants in city centres would grow 150 times faster than plants in the countryside.
Plants growing at that rate would exhaust the soil, then we there and die. There has been no recorded incidents of rapid plant growth. All plants growing too rapidly for sale to support their growth.
Plant growth is in a dynamic balance with the available carbon dioxide. Always resulting insufficient plants to the carbon dioxide at two parts per 1,000,000: the level at which photosynthesis can’t take in carbon dioxide.
Global warming was devised by nuclear power after Chernobyl. Even when the natural climate cooled in 1998; they just moved their PR to the equally biologically impossible man made climate change.
It didn’t predict anything: but plenty happening on a biologically impossible increase of carbon dioxide in the air. Any scientist who knows this fact has a duty to inform the world that it is phantom science.
` totally impossible nuclear fiction. Strangely enough there are 40 the 1,000,000 scientist who knows to be a fact, and yet not one have said anything.
Shortage of carbon dioxide in the air cools the biggest mass extinction in history: at the end of the cretaceous. That is why animals evolved, to exhale more carbon dioxide.
Jonathan Thomason
JonThm9@aol.com
Man made climate change is a biological impossibility. Any scientist is aware of this has a duty to inform the world of the error.
There has been no increase in carbon dioxide in the air due to man. Any additional carbon dioxide is converted that day into new life.
If there was 300ppm of carbon dioxide in the air during the rush hour, plants in city centres would grow 150 times faster than plants in the countryside.
Plants growing at that rate would exhaust the soil, then we there and die. There has been no recorded incidents of rapid plant growth. All plants growing too rapidly for sale to support their growth.
Plant growth is in a dynamic balance with the available carbon dioxide. Always resulting insufficient plants to the carbon dioxide at two parts per 1,000,000: the level at which photosynthesis can’t take in carbon dioxide.
Global warming was devised by nuclear power after Chernobyl. Even when the natural climate cooled in 1998; they just moved their PR to the equally biologically impossible man made climate change.
It didn’t predict anything: but plenty happening on a biologically impossible increase of carbon dioxide in the air. Any scientist who knows this fact has a duty to inform the world that it is phantom science.
` totally impossible nuclear fiction. Strangely enough there are 40 the 1,000,000 scientist who knows to be a fact, and yet not one have said anything.
Shortage of carbon dioxide in the air cools the biggest mass extinction in history: at the end of the cretaceous. That is why animals evolved, to exhale more carbon dioxide.
Jonathan Thomason
JonThm9@aol.com
Thursday, 17 November 2011
No effect
Over the last 200 years photosynthesis has ensured global average carbon dioxide in the air has been static at two parts per 1,000,000. Cities are just too small an area to have any effect.
The 1950s sulphurous war boom. And a spike in carbon dioxide emissions. 1956 was the coldest winter of the 28th century.
1938 so little carbon dioxide emissions. Warmest year of recorded history.
1976 men on recession hottest year in my memory.
2005 climate pundits say it was the warmest year: don’t bear him over 76? That is six years ago air. Every year carbon emissions have quine.
2010 highest carbon emissions on record, coldest winter for 200 years.
Local carbon dioxide concentrations around pub plants maybe higher than the global average. No heating effect seen. Despite the fact they their rates huge amounts of heat.
At Winter the state is liberate heat amounts of heat. A massive amounts carbon dioxide. They are subject to say weather as the countryside.
The big point is global average carbon dioxide can’t shift: not more plants are doing photosynthesis. So carbon dioxide rises in an ice ages. It is a climate follower.
Is how absolutely no affect on the weather: though weather affects the wax and wane of green plants. Two parts per 1,000,000 is equivalent to failing a breath test after having a pint of shandy a week ago air.
Carbon dioxide is a trace gas in the air. It has no effect on the weather. Though it does strike biology. Who thought up global warming?
Taking about nuclear power and you have paid stooges. Base stooges, get the hell out of education.
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 3XQ
JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416
The 1950s sulphurous war boom. And a spike in carbon dioxide emissions. 1956 was the coldest winter of the 28th century.
1938 so little carbon dioxide emissions. Warmest year of recorded history.
1976 men on recession hottest year in my memory.
2005 climate pundits say it was the warmest year: don’t bear him over 76? That is six years ago air. Every year carbon emissions have quine.
2010 highest carbon emissions on record, coldest winter for 200 years.
Local carbon dioxide concentrations around pub plants maybe higher than the global average. No heating effect seen. Despite the fact they their rates huge amounts of heat.
At Winter the state is liberate heat amounts of heat. A massive amounts carbon dioxide. They are subject to say weather as the countryside.
The big point is global average carbon dioxide can’t shift: not more plants are doing photosynthesis. So carbon dioxide rises in an ice ages. It is a climate follower.
Is how absolutely no affect on the weather: though weather affects the wax and wane of green plants. Two parts per 1,000,000 is equivalent to failing a breath test after having a pint of shandy a week ago air.
Carbon dioxide is a trace gas in the air. It has no effect on the weather. Though it does strike biology. Who thought up global warming?
Taking about nuclear power and you have paid stooges. Base stooges, get the hell out of education.
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 3XQ
JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
IPCC is nuclear
Since green plants evolved the level of carbon dioxide in the air is pegged by photosynthesis. Any 
To be a member of the IPCC you blame the natural weather on a fictitious rise of carbon dioxide in the air: a total biological impossibility.
Membership of the IPCC shows the you are not a scientist. You are a nuclear stooge. And should not be allowed anywhere near education.
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 3XQ
JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416
additional carbon dioxide results in more life on earth.
To be a member of the IPCC you blame the natural weather on a fictitious rise of carbon dioxide in the air: a total biological impossibility.
Membership of the IPCC shows the you are not a scientist. You are a nuclear stooge. And should not be allowed anywhere near education.
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays Greater Manchester M50 3XQ
JonThm9@aol.com T/F 0161 848-0416
Sunday, 13 June 2010
CO2 and ice
By JonThm on YouTube.com Jonathan Thomason
Plants take in CO2, and excrete O2: So CO2 is the gas of life, and O2 is their waste. In the Cretaceous, plants hit a brick wall! Green plants had evolved with CO2 at 40%. Now they could only take in during the way, what they respired at night – when they combine O2 with their carbohydrates to get at the residual fusion energy. The plants only got out of the problem, as animals evolved to take in O2, and respire with plant material, and produce CO2. You see plant metabolism is powered by molecular nuclear fusion! During the day they do CO2+3H2O-->He+CH4+O.+E1 where E1 is the release of energy from biological molecular nuclear fusion! Then at night O2+Cm(H2O)n+mO2-->mCO2+nH2O+E2 where E1 is 100 times greater than E2. So life is driven by molecular nuclear fusion! All life on Earth does it: Either to build carbohydrates, or the slow burn of combining them with O2. Your own blood system and heart do it. That is why you breathe out He and CH4, and produce Gamma Wave Radiation – as do plants in the light, and with growing bacteria. Water falls and breaking waves do H2O+O2-->He+O3+E3 The He is lost to space, but we can swell the ozone, and detect the water HEATS up by 20 C as it falls through the air. The deep does both sorts of molecular nuclear fusion. Moist air does the latter – in the light. So 60% of the heat the Earth gets is from molecular nuclear fusion. So how best for man to do it – after all water falls are not very practical! Go talk to an engineer. As a Na fluorescent works, it gives off heat and nuclear radiation, as it slowly uses up its Na gas! We get Na-->2Be-->4He-->8H-->light+E4 So a better light would be charged with H only, but there we produce so much heat, we melt the tube even at low H pressure. So we copy life at hot smokers. Where we do the H2O+O2-->He+O3+E6 But the E6 is so large we set up a steam plasma. And this does loads of molecular nuclear fusion! Though not as much as a H plasma. So we generate 800C heat from steam bubbles, so free. We set up a steam plasma in a glass tube. Then we need a far smaller charge and voltage to maintain the plasma! Na fluorescents use a capacitor to start the plasma, then mains power to maintain the plasma. A lightening bolt is a current discharge as the down stroke: A 1.5 km discharge requires 5,000 V and 100 amps to spike a bolt through moist air. Incidentally, the colliding water drops do the H2O+O2-->He+O3+E3 type of molecular nuclear fusion. This sets up a 1.5 km steam plasma, which generates 120,000,000,000,000,000,000 Watts power output. So if we scale this to a 1m steam plasma tube, at 1 bar, we get 6 MWatts power output. A personal 0.5 m steam plasma tube will generate 3 MWatts, so you get all your power and heat, and sell the excess to the grid. And the power companies send you 5,000 UKP per month! So power with no CO2 – no Global Warming. I told my PhD supervisor this in 2003, and he suggested I went off and worked on cancer! The CO2 stuff came from physicists, who did not understand plants take in all CO2 down to 2 ppm globally, and so there has been no increase in free CO2 in the air, on record. There has been an increase in life. Which is why man started releasing CO2 from fossil fuels in the 18th century, and we had the little ice age. Global Cooling if ever we had it!
Plants take in CO2, and excrete O2: So CO2 is the gas of life, and O2 is their waste. In the Cretaceous, plants hit a brick wall! Green plants had evolved with CO2 at 40%. Now they could only take in during the way, what they respired at night – when they combine O2 with their carbohydrates to get at the residual fusion energy. The plants only got out of the problem, as animals evolved to take in O2, and respire with plant material, and produce CO2. You see plant metabolism is powered by molecular nuclear fusion! During the day they do CO2+3H2O-->He+CH4+O.+E1 where E1 is the release of energy from biological molecular nuclear fusion! Then at night O2+Cm(H2O)n+mO2-->mCO2+nH2O+E2 where E1 is 100 times greater than E2. So life is driven by molecular nuclear fusion! All life on Earth does it: Either to build carbohydrates, or the slow burn of combining them with O2. Your own blood system and heart do it. That is why you breathe out He and CH4, and produce Gamma Wave Radiation – as do plants in the light, and with growing bacteria. Water falls and breaking waves do H2O+O2-->He+O3+E3 The He is lost to space, but we can swell the ozone, and detect the water HEATS up by 20 C as it falls through the air. The deep does both sorts of molecular nuclear fusion. Moist air does the latter – in the light. So 60% of the heat the Earth gets is from molecular nuclear fusion. So how best for man to do it – after all water falls are not very practical! Go talk to an engineer. As a Na fluorescent works, it gives off heat and nuclear radiation, as it slowly uses up its Na gas! We get Na-->2Be-->4He-->8H-->light+E4 So a better light would be charged with H only, but there we produce so much heat, we melt the tube even at low H pressure. So we copy life at hot smokers. Where we do the H2O+O2-->He+O3+E6 But the E6 is so large we set up a steam plasma. And this does loads of molecular nuclear fusion! Though not as much as a H plasma. So we generate 800C heat from steam bubbles, so free. We set up a steam plasma in a glass tube. Then we need a far smaller charge and voltage to maintain the plasma! Na fluorescents use a capacitor to start the plasma, then mains power to maintain the plasma. A lightening bolt is a current discharge as the down stroke: A 1.5 km discharge requires 5,000 V and 100 amps to spike a bolt through moist air. Incidentally, the colliding water drops do the H2O+O2-->He+O3+E3 type of molecular nuclear fusion. This sets up a 1.5 km steam plasma, which generates 120,000,000,000,000,000,000 Watts power output. So if we scale this to a 1m steam plasma tube, at 1 bar, we get 6 MWatts power output. A personal 0.5 m steam plasma tube will generate 3 MWatts, so you get all your power and heat, and sell the excess to the grid. And the power companies send you 5,000 UKP per month! So power with no CO2 – no Global Warming. I told my PhD supervisor this in 2003, and he suggested I went off and worked on cancer! The CO2 stuff came from physicists, who did not understand plants take in all CO2 down to 2 ppm globally, and so there has been no increase in free CO2 in the air, on record. There has been an increase in life. Which is why man started releasing CO2 from fossil fuels in the 18th century, and we had the little ice age. Global Cooling if ever we had it!
Saturday, 12 June 2010
No answer
By JonThm9@aol.com
Jonathan Thomason 117 Merchant’s Quay, Salford Quays, M50 3XQ
Global Warming was thought of by nuclear power – which do physics not biology. So they fingered CO2 as a bad guy! So wrong.
Plants take in CO2 to support all life on Earth. So the only way CO2 levels in the air go up, is to have an ice age! And less life on Earth.
More CO2 = more life on Earth, but there is no more free CO2 in the air: So no effect on the climate.
CO2 levels do change though – trailing weather changes by 4 years: So it is a climate follower.
Nuclear power turns over their plants every 25 years, and mine, purify and ship ore. So they release as much CO2 as if they burned fossil fuels!
But now the world is cooling, And their stooges are trying to ignore this! Some figures say it started cooling in 1998, certainly by 2005 nuclear power started pushing climate change, as Global Warming did not cut any ice any more!
They conceded that nuclear fusion was better, but they funded CERN to ensure we didn’t know how for at least 30 years.
The problem again is biology! Nature takes in high pressure water or steam, in turbulent flow and produces He, O, nuclear radiation and heat.
Your own heart takes in CO2, combines it will water, to make He, CH4, H, O and heat. So your own body does molecular nuclear fusion. We were never taught this was possible, but it is all on record!
At water falls, breaking waves, deep water, photoblasts, growing bacteria and animal blood systems.
It is omnipresent – which was why it was so hard to see. 60% of the heat the Earth gets is from molecular nuclear fusion: Though a lot of this is initiates by solar radiation.
So physics knows all about it too! Engineers are used to chemical plant giving off heat and nuclear radiation: Which happens to be my M.Eng.
So Prof Zimmerman knew this, but tried to pretend it was not important.
The single most important energy system on Earth. Which I gave away. I stand to make no money from the idea.
This will destroy the hydrocarbon and nuclear fission industries. Who have not tried to buy me out, as the idea is out there, and can’t be recalled.
I like the idea of steam plasma tubes to replace burning carbon fuels: So safe power with no CO2, or toxic waste. And no early death.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
