climate change was cured seven years ago

Nuclear not insured

Are still people are on about carbon dioxide and the climate.  2018 my American friend fired up a 30x1,5cm steam plasma and got out a constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.

1 H₂O+PL→2(E²+L+(X-ray)) so the non pressurised plasma burns the regular water into massive heat, the of light and potentially lower pow X rays.

So the goal of a constant 1 MW of carbon zero heat.  I told them the best way to turn their heat into electrical power was whether 12,000 UK pounds the small steam turbine.

Which will generate ½ MW of three phase national mains voltage AC current.  Synchronising the faced with the electricity grid.  So we link to the mains AC current.

In the UK National grid will happily pay us 180 thousand UK pounds annually for that lovely carbon zero power.

You would have thought that the climate change brigade would have expressed interest in this idea.  Not a bit of it.  Seven years later they are still sensing about carbon zero heat.

How he felt an eight is are steam plasma turns regular water into massive heat with a blinding white light and maybe lower power X rays.  No hyper toxic plutonium or strontium.

And we don't utilised enriched uranium in hundred billion nuclear power plant.  We utilised the high voltage electronics from old fluorescent light, to fire up the plasma.

Which then self sustains while we had just 10⁻ⁱ⁶cc of regular water the to the plasma tube a year.  So a zero carbon non nuclear power, that pays an absolute fortune!

But still the climate change people are obsessed about carbon dioxide.  Having failed to appreciate that building a nuclear power plant releases in two years the carbon equivalent of running a commercially fired power station for 25 years.

And after 25 years we demolish the nuclear plant!  Every year operation would require annual operating insurance of 100 billion.  Just not commercially available!

It was 40 billion a year since Chernobyl in 1986.  So all remaining 422 uranium nuclear power plants running criminally under insured.  The biggest corporate crime in history.

And there is no available reprocessing capability to handle the used enriched uranium fission rods.  Since win skill shut down and there is no global nuclear reprocessing on earth.

The idea are shooting themselves in to is just the stupidity.  Or quits failed taken off all the time!  Just ask Space X.

The latest idea was to build an had a C nuclear storage processes.  No he he to are the nuclear boys and sea birds are a geologically active.  Under sea earthquakes are almost a routine occurrence.

And we neither storage to be totally secure for 100,000 years.  We will be lucky to cure two years without an earthquake shattering the underground tunnel system.  Causing the release of highly toxic radioactive waste into the seas.

Making the fish within 100 KM radius in the air door for 100,000 years.  Wiping out local fishing and tourism industries.  Just the life of the stupid idea.

The insurance required for such a facility is immaterial five billion pounds a year!  And again there is no commercially available insurance above one billion a year.  Choir possibly the most stupid idea I have ever heard!

And the London face nuclear storage facilities are at capacity.  Nuclear power has resulted to storing radioactive waste in the short term storage designed for new fission or hours before they are loaded into the reactor.

Licensed for long term storage of nuclear waste.  For cheekily as a shut down nuclear sites like any insurance, as all.  And were required to keep the area secure plant areas for the usual 100,000 years.  The cast years can parole to the worth of the applied 100 times over.

So and a C nuclear storage use chest is stupid idea.  And nobody wants nuclear waste stored in the air them!  Masterly justified not in my backyard - NIMBY.

And the issues the nuclear waste from the existing nuclear plants.  Without adequate safe storage for the used fission materials, or the nuclear plants are required to poor form a total shutdown.

And never restart.  They can be no new nuclear plant on earth.  All the existing plants running criminally under insured.  Carrying the 50 billion there was applicable before windscale 1978.

Not in the 40 billion requiredth since Chernobyl in 1986.  100 billion a year requiredth after Fukushima in 2010 and.  We now had the nuclear plant so suffer a triple core meltdown by the frequency of one major event every 25 years.

And 90% of the safety recommendations recommended after Chernobyl, whenever action by nuclear power: he had chosen to expensive.

Primarily having a backup water cooling system.  Which would are stops the meltdown for the most an army that EDF Fukushima 2010.  One crazy person decided to cite nuclear plant's and the Pacific ring of fire.

Japanese students have daily earthquake drills, four when the inevitable earthquakes hit.  Nobody told nuclear power the need to earthquake the nuclear plants.

So 2010 we got the tsunami hitting the Fukushima nuclear plant near Toleyo in Japan.  And rasher nuclear was so happy!  Family side he had the worst disaster burn the Chernobyl incident in the Ukraine.

Which to my mind was the also approved for nuclear power was the technology of hades.  I should not be a allowed on earth.  Firstly without the adequate 100 billion of annual insurance.

So no capability air to handle the present nuclear waste.  Which really means actioning today!  Or all the nuclear plants in contravention of the basic planning consent.

The national nuclear regulator wants to see nuclear facilities having the adequate insurance cover.  Since Fukushima Greenpeace has alerted the world to the requirement to carry 100 billion of annual insurance cover.

Which nuclear power just ignored!  As he'd turn into the biggest loss making enterprises on earth.  The saving the continent for more massive amount of nuclear death caused by a nuclear incident.

Nuclear power is so not interested in life on earth.  They just want money!